As many of you may have heard, in February the FBI requested that Apple make a modification to their systems to allow them to have access to an encrypted iPhone — which swiftly invoked the ire of the security community. Many experts asked why the FBI would even ask such a “ludicrous” and “short-sighted” question.
They questioned the FBI’s understanding of basic encryption principles and quipped that the decision must have been made by a politician since no security expert would have made such a request. They further pointed to the past revelations about Snowden’s leaks and how many government associations have recently (and continue to) abuse the powers they have been given in this area.
Many worried that such a request would set a precedent, and even the FBI director admitted that it most likely would.
Apple responded in kind and denied the request. This signaled the start of significant political posturing by both players to garner support for their cause. The security community and many industry leaders quickly sided with Apple.
Ultimately the FBI elected to contract a third party who used an unknown exploit to gain access to the device. Both parties ceased their posturing and stood down.